/-
Copyright 2025 The Formal Conjectures Authors.
Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the "License");
you may not use this file except in compliance with the License.
You may obtain a copy of the License at
https://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software
distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS,
WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied.
See the License for the specific language governing permissions and
limitations under the License.
-/
import FormalConjecturesUtilErdős Problem 188
[EGMRSS75] Erdős, P. and Graham, R. L. and Montgomery, P. and Rothschild, B. L. and Spencer, J. and Straus, E. G., Euclidean {R}amsey theorems. {II}. (1975), 529--557.
[Ts17] Tsaturian, Sergei, A {E}uclidean {R}amsey result in the plane. Electron. J. Combin. (2017), Paper No. 4.35, 9.
namespace Erdos188
The set of numbers $k$ such that $\mathbb{R}^2$ can be red/blue coloured with no pair of red points unit distance apart, and no $k$-term arithmetic progression of blue points with distance 1.
def s := { k : ℕ | ∃ blue : Set ℂ,
(Set.univ \ blue).Pairwise (fun c₁ c₂ => dist c₁ c₂ ≠ 1) ∧
¬ (∃ᵉ (bs ⊆ blue) (z) (d), ‖d‖ = 1 ∧ bs.IsAPOfLengthWith k z d) }
What is the smallest $k$ such that $\mathbb{R}^2$ can be red/blue coloured with no pair of red points unit distance apart, and no $k$-term arithmetic progression of blue points with distance 1?
@[category research open, AMS 5]
theorem erdos_188 : IsLeast s answer(sorry) := ⊢ IsLeast s sorry
All goals completed! 🐙
Old and new problems and results in combinatorial number theory by Erdős & Graham (Page 14, 15):
It has been shown that there is a large $M$ so that it is possible to partition $\mathbb{E}^2$ into two sets $A$ and $B$ so that $A$ contains no pair of points with distance 1 and $B$ contains no A.P. of length $M$.
@[category research solved, AMS 5]
theorem erdos_188.variants.nonempty : s.Nonempty := ⊢ s.Nonempty
All goals completed! 🐙
Old and new problems and results in combinatorial number theory by Erdős & Graham (Page 15):
How small can $M$ be made? The only estimate currently known is that $M \le 10000000$ (more or less). In the other direction, it has just been shown by R. Juhász [Ju (79)] that we must have $M \ge 5$.
@[category research solved, AMS 5]
theorem erdos_188.variants.estimate : (∀ k, k ∈ s → 5 ≤ k) ∧ (∃ k ∈ s, k ≤ 10000000) := ⊢ (∀ k ∈ s, 5 ≤ k) ∧ ∃ k ∈ s, k ≤ 10000000
All goals completed! 🐙
end Erdos188