/-
Copyright 2026 The Formal Conjectures Authors.
Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the "License");
you may not use this file except in compliance with the License.
You may obtain a copy of the License at
https://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software
distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS,
WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied.
See the License for the specific language governing permissions and
limitations under the License.
-/
import FormalConjecturesUtilErdős Problem 443
References:
[ErGr80] Erdős, P. and Graham, R., Old and new problems and results in combinatorial number theory. Monographies de L'Enseignement Mathematique (1980).
[He25] Hegyvári, Norbert, An elementary question of Erdős and Graham. arXiv:2503.24201 (2025).
namespace Erdos443
The set ${k(m-k) : 1\leq k\leq m/2}$, where m / 2 is ℕ floor division.
def A (m : ℕ) : Finset ℕ := (Finset.Icc 1 (m / 2)).image fun k => k * (m - k)Let $m,n\geq 1$. What is $$# { k(m-k) : 1\leq k\leq m/2} \cap { l(n-l) : 1\leq l\leq n/2}?$$ Can it be arbitrarily large?
This was solved independently by Hegyvári [He25] and Cambie (unpublished), who show that if $m>n$ then the set in question has size $$\leq m^{O(1/\log\log m)},$$ and that for any integer $s$ there exist infinitely many pairs $(m,n)$ such that the set in question has size $s$.
@[category research solved, AMS 11, formal_proof using lean4 at "https://github.com/plby/lean-proofs/blob/1d7b3f00780b85ed0462e79a1cd5650ee9055655/src/v4.29.1/ErdosProblems/Erdos443.lean"]
theorem erdos_443.parts.i : answer(True) ↔
∀ s : ℕ, ∃ m n : ℕ, n < m ∧ s ≤ (A n ∩ A m).card := ⊢ True ↔ ∀ (s : ℕ), ∃ m, ∃ n < m, s ≤ (A n ∩ A m).card
All goals completed! 🐙Let $m,n\geq 1$. What is $$# { k(m-k) : 1\leq k\leq m/2} \cap { l(n-l) : 1\leq l\leq n/2}?$$ Is it $\leq (mn)^{o(1)}$ for all sufficiently large $m,n$?
This was solved independently by Hegyvári [He25] and Cambie (unpublished), who show that if $m>n$ then the set in question has size $$\leq m^{O(1/\log\log m)},$$ and that for any integer $s$ there exist infinitely many pairs $(m,n)$ such that the set in question has size $s$.
@[category research solved, AMS 11, formal_proof using lean4 at "https://github.com/plby/lean-proofs/blob/1d7b3f00780b85ed0462e79a1cd5650ee9055655/src/v4.29.1/ErdosProblems/Erdos443.lean"]
theorem erdos_443.parts.ii : answer(True) ↔
∀ ε : ℝ, 0 < ε → ∃ n₀ : ℕ, ∀ m n : ℕ, n₀ < n → n < m →
((A n ∩ A m).card : ℝ) < ((m : ℝ) * n) ^ ε := ⊢ True ↔ ∀ (ε : ℝ), 0 < ε → ∃ n₀, ∀ (m n : ℕ), n₀ < n → n < m → ↑(A n ∩ A m).card < (↑m * ↑n) ^ ε
All goals completed! 🐙end Erdos443